Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Why the White House is Smart to Take on FOX



I don't know if this is prevalent in other cultures, I've mostly seen black folks do it as of late - but the one thing that I hate more than black republicans or extremely toothy blowjobs is a person who passionately defends an artist that they like by simply noting the size of their bank account. Let me give you an example. I'm of the firm belief that Tyler Perry's movies are cinematic poison. Even though I don't wish any physical harm on the director, for all I know he has a heart that should qualify him for Sainthood, but the gruesome things that I want to do to people who incessantly gush over his extremely shitty movies would scare the shit out of Stephen King. Stereotypical characters. Phoned in storylines. Cringeworthy dialogue. A black man in a goddamn dress. I'd really have to dedicate a blog series to accurately cite every reason I loathe the creative vision of Tyler Perry. Whenever I've expressed said disdain whether online or in every day conversions, the winning retort that I usually find myself on the business end of goes like this: "Yeah, but he's making money!!" You also get the same clumsy response when you criticize some monosyllabic rapper with a limited world view that they happen to be a fan of. Forget about the substantive gripes that you may have, from sub par lyricism to the fact that said artist happens to be a new millennium minstrel act, the fact that he/she never has to look at a price tag again is supposed to easily thwart all of your artsy fartsy critiques.

I'm only highlighting my least favorite defense of substandard artistry because Rupert Murdock reminded me of it recently when he pointed to FOX's increased ratings after he was asked about the White House taking on his News channel. Tyler Perry's vast fortune doesn't address the piss poor craftsmanship of his movies, a rapper who can pawn his platinum chain collection and singlehandedly pay for sufficient Health Care reform doesn't negate his mindnumbingly wack lyrics - and Rupert Murdoch pointing to an increase in ratings due to FOX's back and forth with the White House doesn't fundamentally answer their claim that they aren't a legitimate news channel. Besides, the White House could care less if they help FOX News get 10 Million more viewers, because their attack on FOX really isn't about FOX.

The White House doesn't have to look any further than that last Democratic Presidential Debate that ABC's George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson hosted to know how quickly right wing smears can infiltrate the mainstream media. People forget that it took both moderators 52 minutes to ask anything resembling a substantive question, most of the time was allotted to silly shit like Flagpins, Reverend Wright, and William Ayers. Stephanopoulos was basically a puppet for the right wing in that debate with Sean Hannity and Steve Malzberg pulling the proverbial strings - being that both men personally urged him to ask about William Ayers when he was on their respective shows. We also can't forget that Reverend Wright was a personal fetish of Sean Hannity's months before the mainstream media finally bowed to right wing finger wagging and started covering it, yet another example of the national discourse being sullied by the mainstream media taking its cues from FOX. Remember the Democratic Presidential Debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama that Tim Russert moderated? I'm sure the White House does. That was a debate where the sorely missed Russert not only asked Obama about Reverend Wright, but didn't seem to accept a clear word like "Denounce" when grilling him on Minister Louis Farrakhan. Undoubtedly more right wing influence.

Listen, that was only a small example of how right wing meems seeped into all facets of the press during the campaign season, if you are an ardent watcher of the news like I am then you know that that sort thing happens all the time. (See Czars, "Enemies lists", "Death Panels") The White House knows this all too well. Their attack on FOX isn't about them "whining", something that many intellectually lazy writers have accused them of. Their attack on FOX isn't about garden variety pushback, they know that the bottom feeders over there will continuously call him everything from a Communist to a puppy torturer no matter how much they fight back. The White House tapping FOX News on the proverbial shoulder and asking them to "step outside" is more about shaming all the other news outlets who from this point forward proceed to regurgitate their horseshit smears as if it were legitimate news. It's an extremely smart tactic. I can totally imagine, after 6 more months of saying that FOX "isn't really a news network", some White House official sarcastically prefacing their answer to someone at CNN with, "Wow, that's a FOX News question.." Its a great way of marginalizing FOX while rhetorically wrapping legitimate news organizations on the wrists for clumsily reporting smears. This is a brilliant strategy, please keep it up.

11 comments:

Mala said...

Well, if you live in the U.S., the prevailing values system is-if you are making money than you must have a product worth something to somebody and if you make that valued product-you must be "smart". Money is the king so if you have it-you rule. I don't agree with part about "smart" but people respect the moneymakers like T.P.

My father used to say, money isn't everything...

Anonymous said...

Yup!!! Notice the village(Washington's media insiders think David Broder and his ilk ) have jumped to Faux's defense. Your bwoy Joey Scar is right indignant about a White House attacking a "news organization" it would be funny if it was not so sad.

joe e said...

Wise words, sir.
I also get pissed when people use the "but he's getting that paper" argument. People really think this life's all about money...it's like there's no greater concern for them.

De'Von Pierre said...

Well said sir. You have a unique point of view and I thoroughly enjoy reading your post. We need you on some of these cable shows instead of these spineless and brain-dead hacks passing for pundits. Keep on bringin the pain. Oh yeah,Tyler Perry sucks.

julieunplugged said...

Thank you for talking sense. I follow you on twitter and am glad you RT'ed yourself. :) So glad someone is calling Fox on lying and the BS they peddle as truth.

Anonymous said...

2 points nailed. You've also hit on the underpinning of the healthcare "debate". Some people REALLY think, that if you don't have healthcare coverage it's because you didn't work hard enough or you didn't earn it. This countries' obsession with financial success = accomplishment is tired and old. Most of the time, "successful" people are just in the right place at the right time. IE- Tyler Perry and your crappy rappers.

As far as the FOX point, couldn't have said it better myself, that is the strategy and it's well played by Obama's Whitehouse. The only problem is there will be a return of the serve eventually where FOX tries to matyr themselves, and some news agencies will come to their defense. Next move after that? That's when it gets tough.

murderator said...

The Tyler Perry phenomenon remains completely bewildering to me. I keep reading gushing reviews of his movies -- in respectable publications! Are they watching the same movies that I'm strenuously avoiding?

Oh, and as far as the Fox News bullshit goes, as you say, high ratings don't equal quality content. It just means that we really are a nation of gullible Lowest Common Denominator motherfuckers.

Alexis said...

Money isn't everything, so people are still entitled to dislike what they want regardless of how successful it is.

Though the post is about Fox News, which I don't watch therefore can't comment on, I have a note about the TP thing.

"Stereotypical characters. Phoned in storylines. Cringeworthy dialogue. A black man in a goddamn dress." All (except the last thing with the dress) are also true of the Judd Apatow movies as well. What I've observed about Tyler Perry movies is that black critics of his work - not necessarily you - seem to think the success of the images he portrays reflect on black culture as a whole and are therefore harmful. I don't find anything wrong with his movies and I respect those who do, but I disagree when people take this approach to criticism. We don't judge other whole races from their movies. For example, white people don't get up in arms about their portrayal in Judd Apatow movies. I think black people should relax the same way. Either like something or don't, but don't make it so personal.

Brother OMi said...

1. the White house hasn't really attacked Fox news... they stated an opinion.

2. from experience, mentioned someone or something's name visibly in public, only gives them power.

3. btw, its murdoch, not murdock...

Anonymous said...

I loved your post though the choice of slur words you used were unflattering.

Stay Positive
www.shekeyultd.com

Rose said...

With the fox news situation, I never thought about it like that. That's is a good strategy.